This document was compiled by the Delta Centre in Norway after the 2012 International UD Conference in Oslo. The conference gathered researchers, students, users, planners, public officers and other practitioners from 44 countries. More than 150 presentations were given. This multidisciplinary anthology contains examples from around the globe. Download PDF Trends in Universal Design here, or access via the web.
The Delta Centre is the Government’s National Resource Centre for Participation and Accessibility, and works for an inclusive society for a diverse population.
Article by Margaret Ward and Jill Franz, published in Housing and Space: Toward Socio-Spatial Inclusion (Social Inclusion, Vol 3 No2). An Open Access Journal.
This article outlines the findings from interviews with industry personnel about incorporating the 8 features agreed in the Livable Housing Design Guidelines. This is a telling paragraph:
“In summary, when providing the eight features for visitability, the interviewees identified two themes for non-compliance (“lack of thought” and “otherness”) and three themes for compliance (“fashion”, “requirement’ and “good practice”). Although all dwellings provided some features, no dwelling provided a coherent path of travel necessary to make a dwelling visitable. Some examples of this incoherence were: a step-free driveway which led to a step at the door; a wide front door which led to a narrow corridor; and a narrow internal doorway which did not allow entry of a wheel-chair to a spacious bathroom. The provision of these access features separately and severally did not provide visitability as an outcome in any of the dwellings.
You can download the full issue of the publication here
This slideshow was presented by Jane Bringolf at the Australian Association of Gerontology National Conference held in Adelaide in November 2014. It outlines the course of the COTA NSW Liveable Communities Project and the work done with 23 councils in New South Wales.
Download the PDF Jane Bringolf AAG Conference 2014 presentation
In this paper from the State of Australian Cities (SOAC) Conference in 2011, Margaret Ward traces the history of National Dialogue on Universal Housing Design to the current organisation, Livable Housing Australia and the voluntary code, the Livable Housing Design Guidelines. She outlines why the voluntary approach is unlikely to work and that regulations will be the only way to accomplish the roll-out of more accessible homes.
Download Margaret Ward’s 2011 paper PDF
Jane Bringolf’s presentation to the Brisbane Housing Forum in May 2014. She discusses different perspectives on human rights, particularly in an era of demand for cost-benefit analyses and asks the question, how can we attain our rights within a market discourse, when those who do not experience social and economic exclusion have the the power of the market in their hands?
PDF document Housing Forum Brisbane 2014
Word document Housing Forum Brisbane 2014
The Norwegian Government has taken the principles of universal design and applied them to their planning policies. This has the effect of making everyone responsible for inclusion at every level – in the built environment, outdoor areas, transport, and ICT. You can download their latest action plan Norway universally designed by 2025.