What can you do to improve compliance with disability access standards when heritage and disrepair are commonplace? And when they are misunderstood, seen as too hard to implement, and where buildings are in a serious state of disrepair. This was the challenge set by Australia’s overseas aid program in Sri Lanka. The aim of this project was to find a way to educate built environment professionals in Sri Lanka about complying with disability access regulations.
Rather than take a text book approach to explaining the standards, the training group took a universal design approach. That meant focusing on the reasons why certain designs were needed, not just the need to apply the standard.
In her paper on this project, Penny Galbraith details the particular issues Sri Lanka faces. The complexities were major heritage sites, assets in disrepair, obsolete infrastructure, and transport designs from previous centuries. “Universal design was the ideal starting point, not least because of its emphasis on users, but also that it allows for acknowledging and embracing cultural factors which is very important given ethnic tension in Sri Lanka”.
An interesting application of the principles of universal design. It shows that reducing barriers in the built environment is reliant on understanding why, not just how to comply. The title of the paper is, A Practitioner’s Universal Design Approach Making a Difference to Distressed Assets in Sri Lanka.
From the the UDHEIT 2018 conference held in Dublin, Ireland.