The Association of Consultants in Access Australia’s latest online newsletter has an interesting article on the history of the access movement in Australia. The other item of interest is titled Blind Speed – the story of a man who lost his sight some time ago, but has become a leader in the field of various sports. He aims to claim the record for the fastest speed on a motorbike – blindfolded! It also has a wrap up of their recent conference in Brisbane, and the inaugural Max Murray oration. There are items of additional interest for access consultants.
Neat video by Barclays Bank that debunks common myths about customer complaints, costs of being accessible, access being someone else’s job, it’s too small a market for all that time and effort, and accessible design is boring design. Towards the end there is a great statement, “accessible design should work well for those who need it, and be invisible to those who don’t”. A really useful video for anyone promoting accessible customer service in our digital world, and for others wondering if it really is worth the effort. The video is captioned. You can find out more about Barclays work in this area. They also have a Twitter feed.
Many people think that technology will save money in the aged care sector, but maybe time to think again. Seems best outcomes are when socialisation is provided. The answer to staying at home longer, apart from an accessible home, is to use technology, but use the savings for social visits from real humans. A recent study shows that when home based care services are increased the greater delay of residential care. While this seems obvious, this study confirms it. The research also found that people who used social support services, such as companionship visits and assistance to attend community-based social activities, stayed in their own homes for longer, compared with those predominately receiving domestic assistance, personal care or in-home respite. The evidence can also help older people understand they have choices about where they are cared for. This article was sourced from Aged Care Insight.
When you gotta go, you gotta go. To make this event more interesting we now we have international toilet tourism awards. These toilets are not just functional, they are interesting too. However, not sure if all are accessible judging by the comments. You can read more about each of the winners and the judges comments in the different categories. Queensland, Northern Territory, New South Wales, and Victoria all have winners. Toowoomba’s portable toilet took out the main prize. Other winners are from the USA and New Zealand. And yes, there is such a thing as World Toilet Day. Get your toilet nomination ready for next year’s awards – let’s see some creative and accessible toilets as winners!. Submissions open next February.
The toilet pictured above as beach huts is one in the Toowoomba Portable Toilet range, and the one to the left depicting a rustic theme is the overall winner for 2017.
After seeing the Auckland Design Manual and the work they have done on promoting universal design, it is a pity that the designers of Auckland’s Freyberg Place didn’t seem to refer to it. Simon Wilson gives a good critique of the new public space, both positive and not so positive. It is good to see how he pinpoints what would be glaring errors to followers of inclusive/universal design. See the article for the design “errors” that really just amount to thoughtlessness. Form has overtaken function in this example. In a separate article by Chris Barton, the issues of design and development are outlined.
Auckland is a city built on steep grades in all directions. So accessible paths of travel are always going to be a problem. Freyberg Place is designed deliberately with steps, says Chris Barton, which are supposed to replicate lava flows. The steps are meant to double as seating, but there are two things missing: back and armrests and some shade and rain cover. While there is poor pram and wheelchair access, at least more mobile people could sit in comfort.
The Conversation has published another article in its series Healthy Liveable Cities. We know that active travel has positive health benefits. But now entering the debate is the cost of car ownership – costs which are often not calculated by car owners. The article describes four scenarios on housing and car ownership and the weekly costs to the households. The costs range from over $300 a week to $24 a week using Melbourne as the benchmark. Costs of public transport vary considerably from state to state and from city to regional areas, but the point is made. The article is based on research from University of New South Wales and is well worth reading to the end.
Editor’s note: Poverty can be exclusionary when people are constrained from participating in the basic activities of life.
Nurses and other health professionals are the latest group to be urged to play a part in creating improvements to the built environment to promote healthy ageing. Dr Anthony Tuckett of University of Queensland’s School of Nursing says, “This would involve older adults taking an active role in documenting features of their environment that help or hinder healthy living and then voicing them to policy makers to promote change.” This is not a new idea. The World Health Organization promotes the idea of a “bottom up” approach to improving streets and neighbourhoods for older people. The two minute video below “Our Voice Citizen Science for Health Equity” explains more and you can see the article, Senior citizen science: older people urged to advocate for changes to built environment, published in Aged Care InSite.